October 24, 2007
The U.S. should heed the wrath of the World Trade Organization by making betting games legal on the Web. Pro or con?
Pro: It’s Prohibition All Over Again
by Martin Owens, Gaming-Issues Attorney
The passage of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) in October has led Antigua, which had previously sued America in 2003 before the World Trade Organization over the issue of Internet gambling, to seek relief before the world body once more. Chief among Antigua’s claims was that U.S. laws against Internet gambling constituted a trade barrier in violation of trade obligations.
Click here to go to the article and read more.
Con: This Vice Deserves No Encouragement
by Guy C. Clark, National Coalition Against Legalized Gambling
The U.S. government’s obligation to protect its citizens from a toxic, addictive product exceeds its responsibility to please the gnomes at the WTO.
Gambling addiction rises predictably with proximity of games and speed of play. Nothing is more proximate than a personal computer, and nothing works faster. Plus, the Internet adds the deadly element of anonymity. The neighbors won’t spot you at the virtual casino. Solid citizens with no previous criminal record commit outrageous crimes when addicted to gambling.
Click here to go to the article and read more.
Recovered from the Poker Players Alliance archive index. This is the archived item as preserved.








